Introduction

Over recent decades, behavioural public policy has evolved into a vital interdisciplinary field, integrating insights from psychology, sociology, and economics. This development marks a significant shift from traditional economic models, which often assume rational, utility-maximising behaviour, towards a more nuanced understanding of the complexities inherent in real-world human decision making.

Despite significant advancements, challenges such as the replication crisis in psychology and the over-reliance on WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, Democratic) populations have highlighted the limitations of traditional approaches. These issues underscore the necessity for a more culturally sensitive approach to behavioural public policy, one that can effectively address the diverse contexts in which human behaviour occurs.

The Fourth Wave of behavioural public policy, grounded in cultural evolutionary behavioural science, offers a compelling framework for overcoming these limitations. By integrating cultural and genetic evolutionary thinking, this approach provides a comprehensive understanding of human behaviour, enabling the design of more effective and contextually relevant policies. This article explores the theoretical foundations of this emerging paradigm and examines its practical implications for public policy design.

Historical Context: The Evolution of Behavioural Public Policy

The development of behavioural public policy can be traced through three distinct waves, each building upon and refining the insights of its predecessors. The initial wave saw the integration of psychological concepts into economic theory, challenging the traditional notion of rationality. Pioneering work by scholars such as Herbert Simon, Daniel Kahneman, and Amos Tversky laid the foundation for a new understanding of decision making, highlighting the importance of heuristics and biases in shaping human behaviour.

Building on these insights, the second wave, driven by behavioural economics, introduced the concept of “nudging.” Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein’s seminal work, Nudge (2008), demonstrated how subtle changes in the choice architecture could guide individuals towards making better decisions without restricting their freedom. This approach quickly gained widespread acceptance among policymakers, leading to its adoption across various domains, including health, finance, and environmental policy.

As behavioural public policy matured, the third wave focused on applying these insights to real-world challenges. Notable initiatives such as the UK’s Behavioural Insights Team (BIT) and the U.S. Social and Behavioural Sciences Team (SBST) exemplified this approach, successfully implementing interventions that improved outcomes in areas such as tax compliance and energy conservation. However, the limitations of these approaches became increasingly apparent. The reliance on research conducted primarily within WEIRD populations raised questions about the generalisability of these findings to non-Western, culturally diverse settings. Furthermore, the context-dependent nature of many behavioural interventions highlighted the need for a more flexible, culturally informed approach.

The Fourth Wave: Integrating Cultural Evolution with Behavioural Science

Cultural evolutionary behavioural science offers a promising solution to these challenges by integrating the principles of cultural evolution with behavioural science. This approach recognises that human behaviour is shaped by both genetic and cultural inheritance, with cultural evolution occurring at a much faster pace than genetic evolution. By understanding how cultural traits are transmitted and how they evolve over time, policymakers can design interventions that are not only effective but also sensitive to the cultural contexts in which they are implemented.

A central concept in cultural evolutionary behavioural science is dual inheritance theory (DIT), which posits that human behaviour is influenced by two interrelated systems: genetic and cultural inheritance. Unlike genetic evolution, which unfolds over millennia, cultural evolution can lead to significant behavioural changes within a single generation. This rapid pace of cultural change is driven by mechanisms such as social learning, where individuals acquire behaviours from others within their community. Social learning biases – preferences for learning from successful, prestigious, or majority individuals – play a crucial role in this process, guiding the transmission of cultural traits and shaping collective behaviour.

Muthukrishna and Schimmelpfennig (2023) emphasise that cultural evolution is a key element in designing effective and context-sensitive policies. They argue that considering cultural dynamics in policy development not only enhances the impact of interventions but also ensures the long-term acceptance and sustainability of these measures.

The Role of Norms and Cooperation in Cultural Evolution

Norm psychology, another key element of cultural evolutionary behavioural science, examines how social norms develop, spread, and are enforced within groups. Social norms are powerful drivers of behaviour, often dictating what is considered acceptable or unacceptable within a community. Research by Robert Cialdini has shown that individuals are heavily influenced by their perceptions of what others are doing, making norms a potent tool for policymakers. For instance, public campaigns that highlight the prevalence of positive behaviours, such as recycling or voting, can leverage social norms to encourage widespread adoption.

Cultural group selection further extends this understanding by suggesting that groups with strong cooperative norms are more likely to succeed in competitive environments. Cooperation psychology explores the mechanisms that enable collaboration among individuals, even in situations where personal gain is not immediately apparent. Research by Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis (Gintis, 2000; Bowles and Gintis, 2002, 2011) has demonstrated that cooperative behaviour is often underpinned by social norms and cultural practices that promote group cohesion and collective action. Henrich (2004) further elaborates on how cultural group selection and coevolutionary processes can lead to large-scale cooperation, which is essential for the success of public policies aimed at enhancing collective action in diverse societies.

Applying Cultural Evolution in Public Policy

The integration of these concepts with traditional behavioural science offers a more holistic understanding of human behaviour. While traditional behavioural science often treats individuals as isolated agents, cultural evolutionary behavioural science emphasises the importance of cultural transmission and the collective dynamics that shape individual behaviour. This approach is particularly valuable in understanding how cultural factors, such as norms around fairness and cooperation, vary across societies and influence responses to policy interventions.

Joseph Henrich’s research on cultural evolution has demonstrated significant variations in norms related to fairness and cooperation across different societies. For instance, Henrich’s studies on the Ultimatum Game reveal how cultural differences shape individuals’ perceptions of fairness, significantly influencing their responses to economic incentives. These variations suggest that policies must be tailored to the cultural contexts in which they are implemented to be effective. This insight highlights the importance of designing policies that are informed by a deep understanding of cultural dynamics, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all approach. Moreover, Henrich et al. (2001) in their study across 15 small-scale societies, found that economic behaviours vary greatly depending on local cultural norms, further emphasising the need for culturally specific policy interventions.

Contextualising Interventions: The Importance of Cultural Sensitivity

One of the key lessons from cultural evolutionary behavioural science is the importance of contextualising interventions. Policies designed without consideration of the cultural and historical context in which they are implemented are likely to fail. By understanding the cultural and contextual factors that influence behaviour, policymakers can design interventions that are better suited to the specific needs and circumstances of different populations.

For instance, a health intervention that is effective in one cultural context may require significant adaptation to be successful in another. Michele Gelfand’s (2019) research on cultural tightness and looseness illustrates how societies differ in their tolerance for deviance from social norms, with tight cultures enforcing norms more strictly and loose cultures being more permissive. These differences have direct implications for policy design. In tight cultures, interventions that align with existing norms may be more effective, while in loose cultures, policies that encourage norm change may be necessary. Henrich (2001) further explores how biased cultural transmission can influence the diffusion of innovations, suggesting that understanding these biases is crucial for the successful implementation of new policies and practices.

Leveraging Cultural Diversity in Policy Design

Cultural diversity presents both challenges and opportunities for public policy. On the one hand, policies must be flexible enough to accommodate different cultural norms and practices. On the other hand, cultural diversity can be a source of strength, providing a rich pool of cultural practices and knowledge that can be leveraged to encourage positive behaviours. By engaging with local communities to understand their cultural practices and values, policymakers can design interventions that are more likely to be accepted and adopted.

For example, the success of the Swachh Bharat (Clean India) campaign can be attributed to its alignment with cultural values of cleanliness and community pride, which were deeply ingrained in Indian society. By engaging local leaders and tapping into existing cultural narratives, the campaign was able to generate widespread behavioural change. This case illustrates the importance of culturally aligned policy interventions in achieving successful outcomes.

Harnessing Technology: The Double-Edged Sword of Digital Interventions

The digital age has introduced new dynamics into the cultural evolution process, with technology and social media playing a significant role in shaping behaviour. Digital platforms can accelerate the spread of cultural practices and norms, making them powerful tools for policy interventions. However, these platforms also pose challenges, such as the rapid spread of misinformation or the adoption of cultural practices in ways that diverge from their original intent. Policymakers must carefully design digital interventions that leverage the positive aspects of technology while mitigating its potential downsides.

Research by Aral et al. (2009) Aral (2021) has shown that social media can be used to encourage positive behaviours, such as increasing voter turnout or promoting healthy behaviours. However, the same platforms can also amplify negative social norms, making it crucial for policymakers to design interventions that consider the complex dynamics of digital culture. For example, campaigns that leverage social proof – where individuals are influenced by the actions of others – can be particularly effective in encouraging pro-social behaviour in digital spaces.

Social Tipping Points: Leveraging Endogenous Cultural Change

Cultural evolution is often driven by endogenous processes, where small changes within a culture can be conducive to significant shifts in behaviour over time. Understanding these processes can help policymakers identify social tipping points – moments when a small intervention can lead to widespread behavioural change. Research by Centola (2010) on social network dynamics has demonstrated that behavioural change can spread rapidly through social networks once a tipping point is reached, making it possible to achieve large-scale change with relatively small interventions.

For example, Centola’s (2018) work on health behaviours has shown that strategically targeting key individuals within a network can create cascading effects that influence the broader population. By identifying and leveraging these tipping points, policymakers can design interventions that are both efficient and impactful, achieving widespread change with minimal resources.

Actionable Recommendations

1. Implement Cultural Context Audits: Make “Cultural Context Audits” a mandatory step in policy design. These audits assess cultural, historical, and social factors that could impact policy success. By integrating these audits early, policymakers can design interventions that are culturally informed and contextually appropriate.
2. Use Cultural Evolution Metrics: Develop “Cultural Evolution Metrics” to track how policies influence cultural dynamics over time. These metrics, including shifts in social norms and cultural practices, should be embedded in evaluation frameworks to ensure sustainable policy outcomes.
3. Facilitate Community Co-Design Workshops: Establish “Community Co-Design Workshops” where local stakeholders and policy designers collaborate to create interventions. This approach ensures policies are tailored to specific communities and have the support and engagement of those most affected.
4. Promote Cultural Literacy Training: Implement “Cultural Literacy Training” for public officials to enhance their understanding of cultural diversity in policy design and implementation. This training equips officials to navigate complex cultural landscapes and design more inclusive and effective policies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Fourth Wave of behavioural public policy, grounded in cultural evolutionary behavioural science, offers a promising new approach to understanding and influencing human behaviour. By integrating insights from cultural evolution, this approach addresses many of the limitations of traditional behavioural science, providing a more comprehensive and context-sensitive framework for public policy. The potential of this Fourth Wave to transform public policy is significant, particularly in its ability to design interventions that are culturally adaptive, sustainable, and effective across diverse contexts. As policymakers, researchers, and practitioners continue to explore and apply these principles, there is an opportunity to create policies that not only achieve immediate outcomes but also contribute to long-term cultural change.

Policymakers, researchers, and practitioners are encouraged to consider the insights of cultural evolutionary behavioural science in the design and implementation of future policies. By embracing this Fourth Wave, a more inclusive, effective, and sustainable approach to public policy can be created – one that truly reflects the diverse cultural contexts in which it operates.

 

References

Aral, S. (2021), The Hype Machine: How Social Media Disrupts Our Elections, Our Economy, and Our Health—and How We Must Adapt, New York: Currency

Aral, S., L. Muchnik, and A. Sundararajan (2009), Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(51), 21544-21549.

Aral, S. and D. Walker (2011), Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks, Management Science, 57(9), 1623-1639.

Bowles, S. and H. Gintis (2002), The inheritance of inequality, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 3-30.

Bowles, S., and H. Gintis (2011), A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution, Princeton: Princeton University Press

Boyd, R. and P. J. Richerson (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Boyd, R. and P. J. Richerson (2005), The Origin and Evolution of Cultures, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Centola, D. (2010), The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment, Science, 329(5996), 1194-1197.

Centola, D. (2018), How behavior spreads: The science of complex contagions, Princeton: Princeton University Press

Centola, D., V. M. Eguiluz, and M. W. Macy (2007), Cascade dynamics of complex propagation, Journal of Statistical Physics, 128(1-2), 205-218.

Cialdini, R. B. (2007), Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, New York: Harper Business

Cialdini, R. B., C. A. Kallgren, and R. R. Reno (1991), A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234.

Gelfand, M. J. (2019), Rule Makers, Rule Breakers: How Tight and Loose Cultures Wire Our World, New York: Scribner

Gelfand, M. J., L. H. Nishii, and J. L. Raver (2006), On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1225-1244.

Gintis, H. (2000), Strong reciprocity and human sociality, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206(2), 169-179.

Henrich, J. (2001), Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations: Adoption dynamics indicate that biased cultural transmission is the predominate force in behavioral change, American Anthropologist, 103(4), 992-1013.

Henrich, J. (2004), Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53(1), 3-35.

Henrich, J. and R. Boyd (2001), Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208(1), 79-89.

Henrich, J., S. J. Heine, and A. Norenzayan (2010), The weirdest people in the world?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83.

Henrich, J., R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, H. Gintis, and R. McElreath (2001), In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies, American Economic Review, 91(2), 73-78.

Muthukrishna, M. and P. Schimmelpfennig (2023), Cultural evolutionary behavioral science in public policy, Journal of Public Policy, 43(2), 470-496.

Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Richerson, P. J. and R. Boyd (2005), Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Sloan Wilson, D. (2019), This View of Life: Completing the Darwinian Revolution, New York: Pantheon

Sloan Wilson, D. and E. O. Wilson (2007), Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology, The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82(4), 327-348.

Sunstein, C. R. and R. H. Thaler (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New York: Penguin Book