Introduction

Green Nudging has emerged as a pioneering approach in environmental policy, designed to guide individuals towards more sustainable behaviours without resorting to stringent regulations or coercive measures. Rooted in behavioural economics, this method has gained international acclaim and implementation. Countries such as the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and the United States have established specialised “nudge units” to craft and deploy these behavioural interventions, though the extent and enthusiasm of adoption vary. For example, the UK and the USA have been at the forefront, establishing robust frameworks and dedicated units, while Germany’s uptake has been more cautious due to cultural scepticism towards state interventions. Successful cases, like the UK’s initiative to default new electricity contracts to renewable energy sources, highlight the potential of this approach.

The efficacy of nudging interventions is well-documented. Various experiments have illustrated nudging’s cost-effectiveness compared to traditional financial incentives, significantly enhancing desired behaviours through subtle behavioural cues and default settings.

This article examines the multifaceted aspects of Green Nudging, evaluating the potential benefits of increased governmental investment in this strategy. It investigates the distinctions between informing and nudging, compares incentive-based and norm-based policy designs, evaluates the role of social norms, and considers Green Nudging’s suitability as a core regulatory instrument. Additionally, it addresses the limitations of nudging, particularly in nurturing intrinsic motivation for pro-environmental behaviours.

Informing vs. Nudging

Conceptual Distinctions

Informing and nudging represent distinct strategies within behavioural change frameworks. Informing provides individuals with factual information, empowering them to make informed decisions. This approach operates on the assumption that increased awareness will drive more sustainable choices. However, the effectiveness of informing alone is often limited by the cognitive effort required and the deep-seated nature of many unsustainable behaviours (Abrahamse et al., 2005).

Nudging subtly guides choices by altering the decision making environment. Leveraging insights from behavioural economics, nudging designs settings that encourage specific behaviours without restricting freedom of choice. For example, placing healthier foods at eye level or defaulting to green energy options can nudge people towards better choices without them feeling coerced (Thaler and Sunstein, 2008). Nudging capitalises on cognitive biases and the tendency for people to follow default options, often leading to more immediate and tangible behavioural changes.

Advantages and Challenges

Informing respects individual autonomy and can encourage long-term behaviour change by building a foundation of knowledge and awareness. However, it demands high levels of motivation and cognitive effort from individuals, making it less effective for deeply ingrained or convenience-driven behaviours. Informational campaigns often struggle to overcome the habitual and automatic nature of many environmentally harmful behaviours (Abrahamse et al., 2005).

Nudging offers a low-cost, high-impact alternative capable of bypassing cognitive biases and habitual behaviours. Despite its effectiveness, nudging raises ethical concerns about manipulation and may not address underlying attitudes or result in long-term change. Nudges work best when they are subtle and align with people’s intrinsic motivations. However, they can sometimes be perceived as paternalistic, leading to resistance and undermining their effectiveness (Loewenstein and Chater, 2017).

In environmental policy, informing and nudging serve complementary roles. For instance, educating the public about the benefits of recycling can be paired with strategically placed recycling bins to increase participation rates (Schultz et al., 2007). This combination builds a foundation of knowledge and awareness while effectively directing behaviour towards desired outcomes.

Evidence-Based Insights

Ölander and Thøgersen (2014) highlight that information alone has not been highly effective in promoting voluntary behaviour change for environmental protection. They emphasise the limitations of information campaigns, which often fail to overcome obstacles such as lack of experience with technology, doubts about efficiency, and anxiety about installation and maintenance. In contrast, nudging, which relies on subtle contextual cues and mental shortcuts, has shown significant potential in influencing decision making processes unconsciously. For example, their studies demonstrate the effectiveness of anchoring through the European energy label and the default effect in promoting participation in the Smart Grid. These insights underscore the importance of integrating behavioural economics principles into environmental policy to achieve meaningful behavioural change.

In many countries, governments have implemented a nudge by charging for plastic bags at supermarkets. This small fee leverages the concept of loss aversion, where people prefer to avoid losses rather than acquire equivalent gains. In England, the introduction of a 5p charge for plastic bags resulted in an 85% reduction in their use within six months of implementation (Poortinga et al., 2016). This highlights how a nudge can significantly change behaviour with minimal cost and effort.

Policy Design Approaches

Incentive-based Strategies

Incentive-based approaches employ financial or material rewards to encourage desired behaviours. Examples include tax breaks for renewable energy use, subsidies for electric vehicles, or fines for excessive waste production. The Homo Economicus model posits that individuals are rational actors responding predictably to incentives. This method offers clear, measurable outcomes and can drive significant behaviour change swiftly. However, it presents challenges, such as the potential for individuals to exploit the system, dependence on continuous incentives, and a lack of cultivating intrinsic motivation (Gillingham et al., 2013).

Incentives can lead to substantial and immediate behaviour changes but often fail to promote long-term sustainability. Over-reliance on external rewards can undermine intrinsic motivation, leading individuals to revert to old habits once the incentives are removed (Gneezy et al., 2011). Effective incentive-based policies should therefore be designed to transition towards intrinsic motivation, ensuring long-term behavioural adherence.

Germany’s Renewable Energy Act (EEG) provides subsidies for households and businesses to install solar panels. These financial incentives have made solar energy more accessible, leading to Germany becoming one of the world’s leaders in solar energy production (Ragwitz et al., 2007). This demonstrates how financial incentives can drive significant and rapid uptake of renewable energy technologies.

Norm-based Strategies

Norm-based approaches leverage social norms and cultural values to influence behaviour. Public campaigns that highlight desirable behaviours or foster a sense of community responsibility exemplify this strategy. The Homo Sociologicus model suggests that individuals are influenced by social norms and values. Norm-based strategies can lead to sustainable behaviour change, enhance community engagement, and build social capital. However, they face variability in norms, enforcement challenges, and slower implementation (Goldstein et al., 2008).

Norm-based interventions tap into the human desire to conform to social expectations and the influence of peer behaviour. By normalising sustainable practices, these interventions can create a social environment where pro-environmental behaviours become the default. However, the effectiveness of norm-based strategies is heavily dependent on cultural context and the existing social fabric. In societies where pro-environmental norms are weak or conflicting, these approaches may face significant resistance (Schultz et al., 2007).

In Sweden, community-based recycling programmes are promoted through social norms. Local governments provide convenient recycling facilities and run campaigns highlighting high community participation rates. The social pressure and sense of community responsibility have led to Sweden achieving some of the highest recycling rates in the world (Dahlén and Lagerkvist, 2010).

Complementary Approaches

Both strategies have their strengths and can be complementary. Incentives can provide immediate motivation, while norms can sustain long-term behaviour change. Combining these approaches addresses both immediate and sustained needs in environmental policy. Successful case studies often mix both methods. For example, financial incentives for reducing energy consumption can be coupled with campaigns promoting energy-saving behaviours as community norms (Allcott, 2011).

Microtargeted Green Nudging

Linking microtargeted green nudging with macro frames can enhance effectiveness. According to Lohmann et al. (2024), nudges that are microtargeted to specific behaviours or populations are more effective when they are framed within broader societal or environmental goals. This linkage helps to contextualise the nudge within a larger narrative, increasing its relevance and acceptability. For example, nudges aimed at reducing household energy consumption can be tied to national energy efficiency goals, thereby making individual actions feel part of a collective effort.

The Opower programme in the United States provides households with feedback on their energy consumption compared to their neighbours. This social comparison nudge has led to a consistent 2-3% reduction in energy use across millions of households. By showing individuals how their consumption stacks up against their peers, the programme leverages social norms to promote energy conservation (Allcott, 2011).

The Power of Social Norms

Mechanisms of Influence

Social norms, the unwritten rules governing behaviour within communities, play a pivotal role in shaping environmental actions. Mechanisms of social influence – peer pressure, role models, and community spirit – drive individuals to conform to pro-environmental behaviours (Cialdini, 2003). These mechanisms can be powerful in promoting sustainable practices, particularly when they leverage existing social networks and cultural norms.

Warm Glow Effect

The Warm Glow Effect, where individuals derive positive feelings from performing good deeds, significantly influences pro-environmental behaviour. Research by Jia and Van der Linden (2020) found that green warm glow, rather than altruistic warm glow, predicts conservation behaviour. This suggests that the emotional rewards of acting sustainably can be a powerful motivator, distinct from the desire to benefit others or the environment directly.

The effectiveness of warm glow in promoting green nudges is contingent on how these emotional benefits are communicated and experienced. Lohmann et al. (2024) found that explicit appeals to warm glow did not significantly boost pro-environmental behaviour compared to simpler calls to action. This implies that while warm glow can enhance motivation, its impact is nuanced and context dependent.

In Denmark, campaigns that highlight the warm glow effect of donating to environmental causes have been effective. For instance, advertising that emphasises the positive feelings associated with donating to tree-planting programmes has increased participation rates. This example shows how highlighting the emotional rewards of pro-environmental behaviour can drive action (Taufik et al., 2015).

Cultural Variability and Challenges

Publicising high recycling rates or energy savings within a community often increases participation, as individuals align with perceived norms. However, there are challenges and limitations to using social norms. Not all individuals may accept imposed norms, especially if they conflict with personal beliefs. Additionally, social norms vary widely across cultures, affecting the universal applicability of certain strategies (Schultz et al., 2007).

To maximise the effectiveness of norm-based interventions, it is crucial to understand and incorporate cultural nuances. For example, in collectivist cultures, community-based approaches may be more effective, while in individualist cultures, emphasising personal benefits and achievements might yield better results.

Comparative Analysis of Green Nudging

Adoption Variances

The extent to which governments adopt Green Nudging varies significantly, influenced by multiple factors. In the UK and the USA, for instance, political support and the establishment of dedicated “nudge units” have propelled the use of Green Nudging (Benartzi et al., 2017). These countries have recognised that behavioural changes can lead to substantial cost savings while achieving environmental goals. The integration of behavioural insights into policy frameworks has facilitated the development and implementation of effective nudging strategies.

The German Context

In contrast, Green Nudging is relatively scarce in Germany. This can be attributed to a deep-seated mistrust of interventions in personal decision making, a sentiment deeply ingrained in German culture. Historical scepticism towards state interventions may explain this reticence. Additionally, German policy tends to focus heavily on legal and technological solutions, such as the Energiewende (energy transition), primarily driven by legislation and technological innovations.

Enhancing Public Acceptance

Acceptance of Green Nudging also varies among populations. Studies indicate that populations in countries like the Netherlands and Denmark, which exhibit strong support for environmental initiatives, are more open to Green Nudging (Steg et al., 2015). These nations have robust social norms that encourage eco-friendly behaviour and widespread public approval of environmental policies.

To enhance acceptance of Green Nudging, governments can draw on insights from behavioural economics and behavioural science. Transparency and education about the goals and methods of nudging can help build trust. Moreover, participatory approaches involving citizens in the design of nudges can increase acceptance (Reisch and Sunstein, 2016). Engaging communities in the co-creation of nudges ensures that interventions are culturally relevant and resonate with local values.

Considering cultural differences and tailoring nudging strategies to local contexts is also crucial. In Germany, for example, initiatives conducted on a voluntary basis and in collaboration with local communities might be more effective than centrally controlled measures (Thaler and Sunstein, 2008).

In the United Kingdom, the “Low-Carbon Communities Challenge” demonstrated the effectiveness of green nudging in building low-carbon communities. The programme supported local communities in implementing carbon reduction projects, such as installing energy-efficient technologies and promoting sustainable behaviours through social norms. Evaluation of the programme showed that community-led initiatives, supported by nudges, significantly reduced carbon emissions and increased community engagement in sustainability efforts (DECC, 2011). This example highlights the importance of community involvement and local context in the success of green nudges. Green nudging is most effective in building low-carbon communities when it is integrated with broader community goals, aligns with local values, and involves active participation from community members.

Actionable Recommen­dations

1. Leverage Default Options: Implement default choices that favour environmentally friendly options, such as making renewable energy the default for new electricity contracts. This utilises the human tendency to stick with preset choices, encouraging sustainable practices without restricting freedom of choice.
2. Integrate Financial Incentives: Combine financial incentives with efforts to nurture intrinsic motivation for sustainable behaviours. Provide subsidies or tax breaks for renewable energy installations while educating recipients about long-term environmental and economic benefits, ensuring immediate uptake and lasting change.
3. Utilise Social Norms: Develop community-based programmes that highlight and promote high participation rates in pro-environmental behaviours. Publicly recognise communities or individuals who achieve significant environmental milestones, leveraging social pressure and the desire to conform to community standards.
4. Enhance Transparency and Participation: Increase acceptance of green nudges by being transparent about goals and methods. Engage the public in the design and implementation process through participatory approaches, ensuring that nudges are culturally relevant and resonate with local values.

Conclusion

Green Nudging offers a promising approach to promoting pro-environmental behaviour by subtly influencing choices. Both informing and nudging have unique strengths and can be effectively combined. Incentive-based and norm-based approaches provide complementary strategies for environmental policy design. Social norms and the Warm Glow Effect play crucial roles in the success of norm-based approaches. While Green Nudging can be a core instrument in regulatory policy, it has limitations and should be balanced with traditional measures. Governments should consider investing more in Green Nudging as part of a comprehensive environmental strategy. While nudges are effective, they should be carefully designed to support intrinsic motivation and complemented with other regulatory measures.

Future research should explore the long-term impacts of nudges and their interaction with intrinsic motivation. Policymakers should continue to innovate and refine behavioural approaches to address evolving environmental challenges.

 

References

Abrahamse, W., L. Steg, C. Vlek, and T. Rothengatter (2005), A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273-291.

Allcott, H. (2011), Social norms and energy conservation, Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10), 1082-1095.

Allcott, H., and S. Mullainathan (2010), Behavioural science and energy policy, Science, 327(5970), 1204-1205.

Andreoni, J. (1990), Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving, The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464-477.

Benartzi, S., J. Beshears, K. L. Milkman, C. R. Sunstein, R. H. Thaler, M. Shankar, W. Tucker-Ray, W. L. Congdon, and S. Galing (2017), Should governments invest more in nudging?, Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041-1055.

Cialdini, R. B. (2003), Crafting normative messages to protect the environment, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105-109.

Deci, E. L., R. Koestner, and R. M. Ryan (1999), A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627.

DECC (2011), Low Carbon Communities Challenge, Department of Energy and Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/­publications/low-carbon-communities-challenge-evaluation-report

Frey, B. S., and R. Jegen (2001), Motivation crowding theory, Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589-611.

Gillingham, K., M. J. Kotchen, D. S. Rapson, and G. Wagner (2013), The rebound effect is overplayed, Nature, 493(7433), 475-476.

Gneezy, U., S. Meier, and P. Rey-Biel (2011), When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behaviour, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 191-209.

Goldstein, N. J., R. B. Cialdini, and V. Griskevicius (2008), A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels, Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472-482.

House of Lords (2011), Behaviour Change, Science and Technology Select Committee, Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/­pa/ld201012/ldselect/ldsctech/179/­17902.htm

Jia, L., and S. Van der Linden (2020), Green but not altruistic warm-glow predicts conservation behaviour, Conservation Science and Practice, 2(6), e211.

Loewenstein, G., and N. Chater (2017), Putting nudges in perspective, Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 26-53.

Lohmann, P. M., E. Gsottbauer, S. Van der Linden, and A. Kontoleon (2024), Chilling results: how explicit warm glow appeals fail to boost pro-environmental behaviour, Behavioural Public Policy, 1-26.

Loewenstein, G., C. R. Sunstein, and R. Golman (2014), Disclosure: Psychology changes everything, Annual Review of Economics, 6(1), 391-419.

Ölander, F., and J. Thøgersen (2014), Informing Versus Nudging in Environmental Policy, Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 341-356.

Ragwitz, M., A. Held, G. Resch, T. Faber, R. Haas, C. Huber, P. E. Morthorst, S. Gual, I. Lovinfosse, C. Vertin, K. Keramidas, M. Rathmann, G. Reece, A. Coenraads, M. Voogt, P. Bodo, P. Georgiou, A. Konstantinaviciute, and B. Heyder (2007), Assessment and Optimisation of Renewable Energy Support Schemes in the European Electricity Market, Fraunhofer Institute Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, Germany.

Schultz, P. W., J. M. Nolan, R. B. Cialdini, N. J. Goldstein, and V. Griskevicius (2007), The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms, Psychological Science, 18(5), 429-434.

Service, O., M. Hallsworth, D. Halpern, F. Algate, R. Gallagher, S. Nguyen, S. Ruda, M. Sanders, S. Kirkman, and B. Vlaev (2014), EAST: Four simple ways to apply behavioural insights, Nesta.

Steg, L., G. Perlaviciute, and E. van der Werff (2015), Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition, Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 805.

Taufik, D., J. W. Bolderdijk, and L. Steg (2015), Acting green elicits a literal warm glow, Nature Climate Change, 5(1), 37-40.

Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein (2008), Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, Yale University Press